|
|
Frustration II
When one has mistaken a rope for a snake, one is necessarily saddled with the frustration of being unable to identify the snake. There were some physicists,
far back in time, who said that seeing the Universe in space and
time is like mistaking a rope for a snake, and they laid our frustration
to that, to a mistake. Their name for this Universe was Jagat, the changing. And they said that if the world which we see is changing, there must be an underlying existence which is not in time and space and neither changing, finite nor divided. Then, since the only way to get from the changeless to the changing is by mistake (because you can't change the changeless), they studied mistakes. And they pointed out that if you have mistaken a rope for a snake, the identity of the snake is beyond the possibility of finding out. Hence, our frustration. Now this frustration shows in our physics. The electron is frustrated in its attempt to reach the proton in the hydrogen atom and close the electrical duality down. (That's Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.) And the Fermi particles are frustrated in their attempt to occupy the same energy state and close down the gravitational plurality. (That's Pauli's exclusion principle.) That leaves us with
a Universe of hydrogen falling together by gravity to galaxies and
stars. But still, with this frustration. As gravity falls the hydrogen together
to galaxies and stars, the gravitational energy gets converted to
kinetic energy and radiation which causes the cosmological expansion.
But the expansion robs the radiation of its energy by redshifting
and causes the recycling of the protons and electrons from the observational
border. That, in turn, drives the gravitational collapse. And it goes round
and round. if the Universe weren't made of frustration it couldn't go on like this. So don't be upset! My guess is that just as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle recycles matter from the border, Pauli's exclusion principle may recycle ION mass matter from black holes as low mass quasars with high redshifts. It's just a guess. 2002
|
